One of the questions frequently posed by students of Spanish concerns the so-called “lisp” that can be heard from most, if not all, Spaniards when speaking Spanish: Why do Spaniards “lisp” (and some seemingly more than others) while Latin American Spanish speakers do not?
There are three important concepts that must be understood in order to answer this question: seseo, ceceo, and distinction.
“Seseo” (pronounced “seseo” in both standard Castilian and Latin American pronunciations) is the word used to describe the pronunciation of the letter “s” in all positions, the letter “z” in all positions, and the letter “c” before “e” or “i” (aka as the “soft” c) as a voiceless alveolar fricative. This variant is standard in Latin America and can be found in the Canary Islands, as well as in some parts of Andalusia.
“Ceceo” (pronounced /seseo/ in Latin American Spanish and /θeθeo/ in Castilian Spanish) is the word used to describe the pronunciation of the letter “s” in all positions, the letter “z” in all positions, and the letter “c” before “e” or “i” (aka as the “soft” c) as a voiceless corono-dentoalveolar groove sibilant. Though this sound lacks an official symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet, it is usually represented by either [s̄] or [θṣ]. This sound is unique to certain areas of Andalusia.
Modern distribution of seseo, ceceo and distinction in Andalusia.
Finally, “distinction” is the maintenance of the phonemic contrast – the differentiation in the pronunciation – between the letter “s” in all positions (pronounced as either an apico-alveolar retracted fricative (chiefly northern or central Spain) or lamino-alveolar retracted fricative (remaining areas)) – and the letters “z” in all positions and “c” before “e” or “i” (aka as the “soft” c) as a voiceless interdental fricative. This pronunciation is considered standard Castilian Spanish and is the basis for Spanish orthography.
The answer to our question of why Spaniards lisp and Latin Americans do not is tied closely to the history of Spain’s exploration of Latin America.
At the start of the century that saw Columbus reach America, Spanish had eight different sibilant phonemes. By the sixteenth century, they gradually began to merge and eventually simplified into three, two (the third was the sound represented by the letters “j” or “g” before “e” or “i”, and is not relevant here) of which corresponded to the letters “s” in all positions, the letter “z” in all positions, and the letter “c” before “e” or “i”. This simplification was not consistent throughout the Peninsula, and the process that took place in Andalusia and in the Canary Islands gave rise to new sibilant and non-sibilant sounds that were exclusive to those areas that eventually resulted in the phenomena of “seseo” and “ceceo”. It was the speakers of the former that made up the larger part of sailors and emigrants to the new lands, bringing with them the seseo-based linguistic variants that would form the foundation for the Latin American variants of Spanish, in particular coastal variants.
At the same time, a different phenomenon was taking place in Andalusia: ceceo. In many parts – particularly the south and west – the two phonemes /θ/ and /s/ merged, creating the sound [s̄] ([θṣ]), which is close, but not identical to the standard Castilian [θ]. While often considered a marker of low socio-economic status, speakers may show sociolinguistic variation, switching between ceceo and distinction due to sociolinguistic pressure in certain settings, using, e.g., ceceo among family and friends and distinction in professional or public settings.
ola, gostaria muito de saber qual a fonte bibliografica usada para este resumo. Estas informações me interessaram bastante, pesquiso a pronúncia do espanhol das américas, mas preciso da fonte! meu email jeannerocha@hotmail sou brasileira. Muito obrigada.
Please stop using the word “lisp”! People who speak English use the “th” sound in many words (with, think) all day long and we don’t go around saying that they all speak with lisp.
Hi, Paul
There is no ‘lisp’ sound in with. It is a very distinct f-like sound or even with an omission of the h creating a more or less t-sound. Also, a lot more tension is present in the pronunciation of th in English than in ceceo pronunciation. Since it is derived from an s sound, the ceceo pronunciation is much softer even, which is why others liken it to a lisp. I don’t see a reason to take it as an insult. By seeing it is a such you are only furthering stigma toward having the speech impediment that is a lisp, which doesn’t really carry any disadvantage and is even viewed as attractive by some, whether as a speech impediment or as pronunciation.
Your first sentence is not correct if you are speaking about standard English. The word “with” in standard English is not pronounced as a voiceless labio-dental fricative /f/ as the last phoneme and definitely not a voiceles alveolar stop /t/. It is pronounced as a voiceless inter-dental fricative /θ/.
Is this page still monitored? (I don’t see much activity.) Maybe I wasn’t paying strict attention that day, but when I studied Spanish in high school (50+ years ago!), I learned that the letter s was always pronounced s, without regard to ceceo (ΘeΘeo), and that ceceo only applied to z and “soft c” (c followed by i or e). Now I see that in some regions, s is pronounced like Θ. Can someone straighten me out? Thanks!